Studies included in quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) (n = ) Studies included in qualitative synthesis (n = ) Full-text articles excluded, with reasons (n = ) Full-text articles assessed for eligibility (n = ) Records excluded (n. PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram. Nov 24, 2016 - Description: This project includes a number of templates for conducting simple meta-analyses in R. License: CC-By Attribution 4.0 International.
Search for reporting guidelines
Most recently added records are displayed first.
- 1
- Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist
- Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement
- Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- TIDieR-PHP: a reporting guideline for population health and policy interventions
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement
- Ten simple rules for neuroimaging meta-analysis
- Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: A pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms
- Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research
- GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research
- AHRQ Series on Complex Intervention Systematic Reviews – Paper 6: PRISMA-CI Extension Statement & Checklist
- Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics (MIBO): Platelet-Rich Plasma and Mesenchymal Stem Cells
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: a 12 step guideline for authors
- A protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
- A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of preclinical studies: why perform them and how to appraise them critically
- Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
- Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Chapter 5 – Standards for Reporting Systematic Reviews
- Systematic Reviews. CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
- The HuGENet™ HuGE Review Handbook, version 1.0. Guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis of gene disease association studies
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0
- Collaborative Approach to Meta Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES)
- Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review
- RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
- RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
- Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group
- Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting
- PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity
- PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- Reporting and presenting information retrieval processes: the need for optimizing common practice in health technology assessment
<p><strong>Workshop Slides</strong></p><p><a href='https://osf.io/qxbaf/'>Conducting Meta-Analysis in R: A Practical Introduction</a></p><p><a href='https://osf.io/w78kh/'>Best Practice Systematic Review - Deakin University</a></p><p><a href='https://osf.io/cmjuw/'>Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Behavioural Medicine: A Practical Introduction to Best Practices - International Congress of Behavioural Medicine, Melbourne, 2016</a></p><p><strong>Simple correlation analyses</strong></p><p><a href='https://osf.io/6bk7b/wiki/Correlation%20Data%20Format/'>Guide to expected data format</a></p><p><a href='https://osf.io/mzucx/'>Conducting and reporting simple meta-analyses using correlation coefficients</a> - <em>an R notebook using knitr and metafor</em></p><p><a href='https://osf.io/ydsq6/'>Conducting and reporting simple meta-analyses using correlation coefficients</a> - <em>example output</em></p><p><strong>Simple standarised mean difference analyses</strong></p><p><a href='https://osf.io/6bk7b/wiki/SMD%20Data%20Format/'>Guide to expected data format</a></p><p><a href='https://osf.io/rs5kd/'>Conducting and reporting simple meta-analyses using SMDs</a></p>